Skip to product information
Before any constitutional claim can be heard on the merits, it must survive the threshold. Federal courts apply a demanding set of justiciability doctrines — standing, ripeness, mootness, and the political question doctrine — that determine whether a case is the right kind of dispute, brought by the right kind of party, at the right time, presenting a question courts can decide. Losing on any one of these thresholds ends the case regardless of how compelling the constitutional argument is on the merits.
The Constitutional Federal Courts Warrior: The Complete Guide to Article III Standing, Ripeness, Mootness, the Political Question Doctrine, Federal Jurisdiction, and the Threshold Doctrines of Constitutional Litigation is Volume XXI of Wayne Richard Evangelista's Constitutional Law Series — the complete practitioner's guide to the threshold doctrines that every federal court constitutional litigator must command.
Wayne Richard Evangelista covers the full threshold doctrine landscape: the Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife three-part standing test — injury in fact, causation, and redressability — and how to satisfy each element at the pleading and summary judgment stages; the Spokeo and TransUnion concrete injury requirements for statutory and digital rights cases; organizational and associational standing; taxpayer standing; third-party standing; the Abbott Laboratories ripeness test; the mootness doctrine and its exceptions including voluntary cessation and capable of repetition; the political question doctrine from Baker v. Carr through Rucho v. Common Cause; and the zone of interests test for statutory standing.
For every constitutional litigator, mastering these threshold doctrines is not optional — it is the prerequisite to getting to the constitutional argument that can actually change the law.
The Constitutional Federal Courts Warrior
$69.99
Sale price
$69.99
Regular price